Agreement Dispatcher
Overview
The Agreement Dispatcher is a pattern for routing requests to handlers dynamically based on the request's content or context, rather than using a fixed type-to-handler mapping. This pattern, described by Martin Fowler in Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture, enables flexible routing logic that can change based on business rules, time, geography, or other runtime conditions.
Brighter supports an Agreement Dispatcher, allowing you to register a lambda function that determines which handler(s) should process a request at runtime.
Standard vs Agreement Dispatcher Routing
Standard 1-to-1 Routing (Default)
In standard Brighter routing, each request type maps to exactly one handler type at compile-time:
services.AddBrighter(options => { })
.Handlers(registry =>
{
// Fixed mapping: MyCommand always goes to MyCommandHandler
registry.Register<MyCommand, MyCommandHandler>();
});Characteristics:
Simple and predictable
Type-safe at compile-time
Fast (no runtime lookup)
Works with
AutoFromAssemblies()Cannot change routing based on request content
Cannot route to different handlers over time
When to use standard routing:
Handler selection doesn't depend on request content
One handler per command/event is sufficient
Simple, straightforward scenarios
This is Brighter's default and recommended approach for most scenarios.
Agreement Dispatcher Routing
Agreement Dispatcher allows dynamic handler selection based on request content or context:
services.AddBrighter(options => { })
.Handlers(registry =>
{
// Dynamic mapping: handler chosen at runtime
registry.Register<MyCommand>((request, context) =>
{
var command = request as MyCommand;
if (command?.Priority == "High")
return [typeof(HighPriorityHandler)];
return [typeof(StandardHandler)];
},
[
typeof(HighPriorityHandler),
typeof(StandardHandler)
]);
});Characteristics:
Flexible routing based on content
Can change behavior over time
Supports multiple handlers
Access to request context
Cannot use
AutoFromAssemblies()Must register handlers explicitly
Small performance overhead (lambda execution)
When to use Agreement Dispatcher:
Handler selection depends on request content
Business rules change over time
Geography or customer-specific routing
A/B testing or feature flags
Multi-tenant routing
Use Cases
1. Time-Based Routing
Route to different handlers as business rules evolve over time:
registry.Register<ProcessOrder>((request, context) =>
{
var order = request as ProcessOrder;
var orderDate = order?.OrderDate ?? DateTime.UtcNow;
// Before Jan 2025: Use old tax rules
if (orderDate < new DateTime(2025, 1, 1))
return [typeof(LegacyTaxOrderHandler)];
// After Jan 2025: Use new tax rules
return [typeof(ModernTaxOrderHandler)];
},
[
typeof(LegacyTaxOrderHandler),
typeof(ModernTaxOrderHandler)
]);Scenario: Tax regulations change, but you need to process old orders with old rules and new orders with new rules.
2. Country-Specific Business Logic
Route based on geographical requirements:
registry.Register<ProcessPayment>((request, context) =>
{
var payment = request as ProcessPayment;
return payment?.Country switch
{
"US" => [typeof(USPaymentHandler)],
"UK" => [typeof(UKPaymentHandler)],
"EU" => [typeof(EUPaymentHandler)],
"JP" => [typeof(JapanPaymentHandler)],
_ => [typeof(InternationalPaymentHandler)]
};
},
[
typeof(USPaymentHandler),
typeof(UKPaymentHandler),
typeof(EUPaymentHandler),
typeof(JapanPaymentHandler),
typeof(InternationalPaymentHandler)
]);Scenario: Payment processing varies significantly by country (regulations, currencies, payment methods).
3. Order Journey Based on Contents
Different order types require different processing workflows:
registry.Register<ProcessOrder>((request, context) =>
{
var order = request as ProcessOrder;
// Digital orders: instant fulfillment
if (order?.Type == OrderType.Digital)
return [typeof(DigitalOrderHandler)];
// Pre-orders: different workflow
if (order?.IsPreOrder == true)
return [typeof(PreOrderHandler)];
// Hazardous materials: special handling
if (order?.ContainsHazardousMaterials == true)
return [typeof(HazmatOrderHandler)];
// Standard physical orders
return [typeof(StandardOrderHandler)];
},
[
typeof(DigitalOrderHandler),
typeof(PreOrderHandler),
typeof(HazmatOrderHandler),
typeof(StandardOrderHandler)
]);Scenario: Orders follow different workflows based on their characteristics.
4. Versioning and Migration
Support multiple API versions simultaneously:
registry.RegisterAsync<CreateUser>((request, context) =>
{
var createUser = request as CreateUser;
// Route based on API version in request
return createUser?.ApiVersion switch
{
"v1" => [typeof(CreateUserV1HandlerAsync)],
"v2" => [typeof(CreateUserV2HandlerAsync)],
"v3" => [typeof(CreateUserV3HandlerAsync)],
_ => [typeof(CreateUserLatestHandlerAsync)]
};
},
[
typeof(CreateUserV1HandlerAsync),
typeof(CreateUserV2HandlerAsync),
typeof(CreateUserV3HandlerAsync),
typeof(CreateUserLatestHandlerAsync)
]);Scenario: Maintain backward compatibility while rolling out new API versions.
5. State-Based Routing
Route based on current state or status:
registry.Register<ProcessRefund>((request, context) =>
{
var refund = request as ProcessRefund;
return refund?.OrderStatus switch
{
OrderStatus.Pending => [typeof(CancelOrderRefundHandler)],
OrderStatus.Shipped => [typeof(ReturnAndRefundHandler)],
OrderStatus.Delivered => [typeof(FullRefundHandler)],
OrderStatus.PartiallyReturned => [typeof(PartialRefundHandler)],
_ => throw new InvalidOperationException($"Cannot refund order in status: {refund?.OrderStatus}")
};
},
[
typeof(CancelOrderRefundHandler),
typeof(ReturnAndRefundHandler),
typeof(FullRefundHandler),
typeof(PartialRefundHandler)
]);Scenario: Refund processing varies based on order state.
Registration Syntax
Basic Registration
registry.Register<TRequest>(
routingFunc: (request, context) => { /* return handler types */ },
handlerTypes: [typeof(Handler1), typeof(Handler2), ...]
);Parameters:
routingFunc: Lambda that takes
IRequestandIRequestContext, returnsList<Type>of handlershandlerTypes: Array of all possible handler types (for DI registration)
Accessing Request Content
The routing function receives IRequest, which you must cast to your specific type:
registry.Register<MyCommand>((request, context) =>
{
// Cast to your specific type to access properties
var myCommand = request as MyCommand;
if (myCommand?.Value == "special")
return [typeof(SpecialHandler)];
return [typeof(StandardHandler)];
},
[typeof(SpecialHandler), typeof(StandardHandler)]);Why the cast? The registry supports multiple request types, so the lambda signature uses IRequest. You need to cast to access type-specific properties.
Accessing Request Context
The IRequestContext provides additional information:
registry.Register<ProcessOrder>((request, context) =>
{
var order = request as ProcessOrder;
// Access context properties
var userId = context.Bag.TryGetValue("UserId", out var id) ? id : null;
var tenant = context.Bag.TryGetValue("TenantId", out var t) ? t : null;
// Route based on context
if (tenant?.ToString() == "premium")
return [typeof(PremiumOrderHandler)];
return [typeof(StandardOrderHandler)];
},
[typeof(PremiumOrderHandler), typeof(StandardOrderHandler)]);Returning Multiple Handlers
Agreement Dispatcher can return multiple handlers, but it must still obey the rule that Send expects a single handler and Publish can have zero-to-many handlers. If you return multiple handlers in a Send request pipeline, Brighter will throw an exception.
Synchronous and Asynchronous Registration
Agreement Dispatcher supports both sync and async handlers:
Synchronous Registration
registry.Register<MyCommand>((request, context) =>
{
var cmd = request as MyCommand;
return cmd?.Priority == "High"
? [typeof(HighPriorityHandler)]
: [typeof(StandardHandler)];
},
[typeof(HighPriorityHandler), typeof(StandardHandler)]);Asynchronous Registration
registry.RegisterAsync<MyCommand>((request, context) =>
{
var cmd = request as MyCommand;
return cmd?.Priority == "High"
? [typeof(HighPriorityHandlerAsync)]
: [typeof(StandardHandlerAsync)];
},
[typeof(HighPriorityHandlerAsync), typeof(StandardHandlerAsync)]);Note: The routing lambda itself is always synchronous. Only the handler execution is async when using RegisterAsync.
Limitations
Cannot Use AutoFromAssemblies
Agreement Dispatcher requires explicit handler registration:
// Cannot use AutoFromAssemblies with Agreement Dispatcher
services.AddBrighter(options => { })
.Handlers(registry =>
{
registry.Register<MyCommand>((request, context) => { /* ... */ },
[typeof(Handler1), typeof(Handler2)]);
})
// .AutoFromAssemblies() won't work with Agreement DispatcherWhy? AutoFromAssemblies() creates fixed 1-to-1 mappings. Agreement Dispatcher needs explicit lambda registration and handler type lists for DI.
Solution: Use .Handlers() to register Agreement Dispatcher routes explicitly:
services.AddBrighter(options => { })
.Handlers(registry =>
{
// Agreement dispatcher routes
registry.Register<MyCommand>((request, context) => { /* ... */ },
[typeof(Handler1), typeof(Handler2)]);
// You can still mix with standard routes
registry.Register<OtherCommand, OtherCommandHandler>();
});Handler Types Must Be Provided
You must provide all possible handler types for DI registration:
registry.Register<MyCommand>((request, context) =>
{
// Your routing logic...
},
[
// All handlers that might be returned must be listed here
typeof(Handler1),
typeof(Handler2),
typeof(Handler3)
]);Why? Brighter registers these handler types with the DI container so they can be resolved at runtime.
Performance Implications
Agreement Dispatcher has a small performance overhead compared to standard routing:
Overhead Breakdown
Standard Routing:
Handler type lookup: Dictionary lookup (~O(1))
No lambda execution
Agreement Dispatcher:
Lambda execution
Handler type lookup: Dictionary lookup (~O(1))
Performance Considerations
For most applications, this overhead is negligible:
Acceptable: Web APIs, message processing, background jobs
Acceptable: 99.9% of scenarios
Consider carefully: Ultra-low latency systems (microsecond SLAs)
Consider carefully: Millions of messages per second
Optimization tip: Keep routing lambdas simple. Avoid expensive operations like database calls or external API calls.
// Good - Simple, fast routing logic
registry.Register<MyCommand>((request, context) =>
{
var cmd = request as MyCommand;
return cmd?.Type == "Fast" ? [typeof(FastHandler)] : [typeof(SlowHandler)];
},
[typeof(FastHandler), typeof(SlowHandler)]);
// Bad - Expensive operation in routing lambda
registry.Register<MyCommand>((request, context) =>
{
var cmd = request as MyCommand;
// DON'T DO THIS: Database call in routing lambda!
var config = _database.GetConfig(cmd.Id); // Expensive!
return config.UseFastPath ? [typeof(FastHandler)] : [typeof(SlowHandler)];
},
[typeof(FastHandler), typeof(SlowHandler)]);Integration with Dynamic Message Deserialization
Agreement Dispatcher can be combined with Dynamic Message Deserialization for two-level routing:
// Level 1: Dynamic deserialization (CloudEvents type → Request type)
var subscription = new KafkaSubscription(
new SubscriptionName("paramore.example.orders"),
channelName: new ChannelName("orders"),
routingKey: new RoutingKey("orders"),
getRequestType: message => message.Header.Type switch
{
var t when t == new CloudEventsType("com.example.order.created")
=> typeof(OrderCreated),
_ => throw new ArgumentException($"Unknown type: {message.Header.Type}")
},
groupId: "order-processor",
timeOut: TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(100)
);
// Level 2: Agreement dispatcher (Request content → Handler)
services.AddBrighter(options => { })
.AddConsumers(options => { options.Subscriptions = new[] { subscription }; })
.Handlers(registry =>
{
registry.Register<OrderCreated>((request, context) =>
{
var order = request as OrderCreated;
// Route to different handlers based on order content
return order?.Country switch
{
"US" => [typeof(USOrderCreatedHandler)],
"UK" => [typeof(UKOrderCreatedHandler)],
_ => [typeof(InternationalOrderCreatedHandler)]
};
},
[
typeof(USOrderCreatedHandler),
typeof(UKOrderCreatedHandler),
typeof(InternationalOrderCreatedHandler)
]);
});This provides powerful, flexible routing:
CloudEvents type determines the Request type
Request content determines the Handler
Complete Example
Here's a complete example showing Agreement Dispatcher with multiple routing strategies:
public class Startup
{
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddBrighter(options =>
{
options.HandlerLifetime = ServiceLifetime.Scoped;
})
.Handlers(registry =>
{
// Time-based routing for tax calculations
registry.Register<CalculateTax>((request, context) =>
{
var taxRequest = request as CalculateTax;
var effectiveDate = taxRequest?.EffectiveDate ?? DateTime.UtcNow;
if (effectiveDate < new DateTime(2025, 1, 1))
return [typeof(TaxCalculator2024)];
return [typeof(TaxCalculator2025)];
},
[typeof(TaxCalculator2024), typeof(TaxCalculator2025)]);
// Country-based routing for payments
registry.RegisterAsync<ProcessPayment>((request, context) =>
{
var payment = request as ProcessPayment;
return payment?.Country switch
{
"US" => [typeof(StripePaymentHandlerAsync)],
"UK" => [typeof(PayPalPaymentHandlerAsync)],
"JP" => [typeof(LocalPaymentHandlerAsync)],
_ => [typeof(InternationalPaymentHandlerAsync)]
};
},
[
typeof(StripePaymentHandlerAsync),
typeof(PayPalPaymentHandlerAsync),
typeof(LocalPaymentHandlerAsync),
typeof(InternationalPaymentHandlerAsync)
]);
// Content-based routing with multiple handlers
registry.Register<ProcessOrder>((request, context) =>
{
var order = request as ProcessOrder;
var handlers = new List<Type>
{
typeof(ValidateOrderHandler) // Always validate
};
// High-value orders get fraud check
if (order?.Total > 10000m)
handlers.Add(typeof(FraudCheckHandler));
// International orders need approval
if (order?.IsInternational == true)
handlers.Add(typeof(ApprovalHandler));
handlers.Add(typeof(FinalizeOrderHandler)); // Always finalize
return handlers;
},
[
typeof(ValidateOrderHandler),
typeof(FraudCheckHandler),
typeof(ApprovalHandler),
typeof(FinalizeOrderHandler)
]);
// Standard routing for simple commands
registry.Register<SimpleCommand, SimpleCommandHandler>();
});
}
}Best Practices
1. Keep Routing Logic Simple
Routing lambdas should be fast and deterministic:
// Good - Simple, fast
registry.Register<MyCommand>((request, context) =>
{
var cmd = request as MyCommand;
return cmd?.Priority == "High"
? [typeof(HighPriorityHandler)]
: [typeof(StandardHandler)];
},
[typeof(HighPriorityHandler), typeof(StandardHandler)]);
// Bad - Complex, slow
registry.Register<MyCommand>((request, context) =>
{
var cmd = request as MyCommand;
// Avoid expensive operations!
var config = LoadConfigFromDatabase();
var result = CallExternalApi(cmd);
return CalculateComplexRouting(cmd, config, result);
},
[/* handlers */]);2. Provide Clear Error Messages
Handle unexpected cases gracefully:
registry.Register<ProcessOrder>((request, context) =>
{
var order = request as ProcessOrder;
return order?.Country switch
{
"US" => [typeof(USOrderHandler)],
"UK" => [typeof(UKOrderHandler)],
"EU" => [typeof(EUOrderHandler)],
_ => throw new InvalidOperationException(
$"No handler configured for country: {order?.Country}. " +
$"Order ID: {order?.Id}, Supported countries: US, UK, EU"
)
};
},
[typeof(USOrderHandler), typeof(UKOrderHandler), typeof(EUOrderHandler)]);3. Document Routing Rules
Document the routing logic for maintainability:
/// <summary>
/// Routes payment processing based on country:
/// - US: Stripe
/// - UK: PayPal
/// - JP: Local payment provider
/// - Others: International gateway
/// </summary>
registry.RegisterAsync<ProcessPayment>((request, context) =>
{
var payment = request as ProcessPayment;
// ...
},
[/* handlers */]);4. Use Standard Routing When Possible
Only use Agreement Dispatcher when you need dynamic routing:
// Good - Use standard routing for simple cases
registry.Register<SimpleCommand, SimpleCommandHandler>();
// Only use Agreement Dispatcher when needed
registry.Register<ComplexCommand>((request, context) =>
{
// Dynamic routing based on content
},
[/* handlers */]);5. List All Possible Handlers
Always provide the complete list of handler types:
// Good - Complete list
registry.Register<MyCommand>((request, context) => { /* ... */ },
[
typeof(Handler1),
typeof(Handler2),
typeof(Handler3)
// All handlers that might be returned
]);
// Bad - Incomplete list
registry.Register<MyCommand>((request, context) =>
{
// Might return Handler3, but it's not in the list!
return [typeof(Handler3)];
},
[
typeof(Handler1),
typeof(Handler2)
// Handler3 missing - will fail at runtime!
]);Troubleshooting
Handler Not Found Error
Problem: Runtime error saying handler type cannot be resolved.
Cause: Handler type not in the handler types array.
Solution: Add the handler to the array:
registry.Register<MyCommand>((request, context) => [typeof(MyHandler)],
[
typeof(MyHandler) // Must be listed here!
]);AutoFromAssemblies Conflicts
Problem: Agreement dispatcher routes not working with AutoFromAssemblies().
Cause: AutoFromAssemblies() creates fixed mappings.
Solution: Use explicit .Handlers() registration:
// Instead of AutoFromAssemblies
services.AddBrighter(options => { })
.Handlers(registry =>
{
// Explicit registration for Agreement Dispatcher
registry.Register<MyCommand>((request, context) => { /* ... */ }, [/* handlers */]);
});Further Reading
Martin Fowler: Agreement Dispatcher - Original pattern description
Dynamic Message Deserialization - Content-based type routing
Request Handlers - Handler basics
Routing - Standard routing in Brighter
Sample Code
Full working examples can be found in the Brighter samples:
Agreement Dispatcher:
Brighter/samples/WebAPI/- Examples of dynamic handler selectionMulti-handler: Various samples showing handler pipeline composition
Last updated
Was this helpful?
