Agreement Dispatcher

Overview

The Agreement Dispatcher is a pattern for routing requests to handlers dynamically based on the request's content or context, rather than using a fixed type-to-handler mapping. This pattern, described by Martin Fowler in Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture, enables flexible routing logic that can change based on business rules, time, geography, or other runtime conditions.

Brighter supports an Agreement Dispatcher, allowing you to register a lambda function that determines which handler(s) should process a request at runtime.

Standard vs Agreement Dispatcher Routing

Standard 1-to-1 Routing (Default)

In standard Brighter routing, each request type maps to exactly one handler type at compile-time:

services.AddBrighter(options => { })
    .Handlers(registry =>
    {
        // Fixed mapping: MyCommand always goes to MyCommandHandler
        registry.Register<MyCommand, MyCommandHandler>();
    });

Characteristics:

  • Simple and predictable

  • Type-safe at compile-time

  • Fast (no runtime lookup)

  • Works with AutoFromAssemblies()

  • Cannot change routing based on request content

  • Cannot route to different handlers over time

When to use standard routing:

  • Handler selection doesn't depend on request content

  • One handler per command/event is sufficient

  • Simple, straightforward scenarios

This is Brighter's default and recommended approach for most scenarios.

Agreement Dispatcher Routing

Agreement Dispatcher allows dynamic handler selection based on request content or context:

Characteristics:

  • Flexible routing based on content

  • Can change behavior over time

  • Supports multiple handlers

  • Access to request context

  • Cannot use AutoFromAssemblies()

  • Must register handlers explicitly

  • Small performance overhead (lambda execution)

When to use Agreement Dispatcher:

  • Handler selection depends on request content

  • Business rules change over time

  • Geography or customer-specific routing

  • A/B testing or feature flags

  • Multi-tenant routing

Use Cases

1. Time-Based Routing

Route to different handlers as business rules evolve over time:

Scenario: Tax regulations change, but you need to process old orders with old rules and new orders with new rules.

2. Country-Specific Business Logic

Route based on geographical requirements:

Scenario: Payment processing varies significantly by country (regulations, currencies, payment methods).

3. Order Journey Based on Contents

Different order types require different processing workflows:

Scenario: Orders follow different workflows based on their characteristics.

4. Versioning and Migration

Support multiple API versions simultaneously:

Scenario: Maintain backward compatibility while rolling out new API versions.

5. State-Based Routing

Route based on current state or status:

Scenario: Refund processing varies based on order state.

Registration Syntax

Basic Registration

Parameters:

  • routingFunc: Lambda that takes IRequest and IRequestContext, returns List<Type> of handlers

  • handlerTypes: Array of all possible handler types (for DI registration)

Accessing Request Content

The routing function receives IRequest, which you must cast to your specific type:

Why the cast? The registry supports multiple request types, so the lambda signature uses IRequest. You need to cast to access type-specific properties.

Accessing Request Context

The IRequestContext provides additional information:

Returning Multiple Handlers

Agreement Dispatcher can return multiple handlers, but it must still obey the rule that Send expects a single handler and Publish can have zero-to-many handlers. If you return multiple handlers in a Send request pipeline, Brighter will throw an exception.

Synchronous and Asynchronous Registration

Agreement Dispatcher supports both sync and async handlers:

Synchronous Registration

Asynchronous Registration

Note: The routing lambda itself is always synchronous. Only the handler execution is async when using RegisterAsync.

Limitations

Cannot Use AutoFromAssemblies

Agreement Dispatcher requires explicit handler registration:

Why? AutoFromAssemblies() creates fixed 1-to-1 mappings. Agreement Dispatcher needs explicit lambda registration and handler type lists for DI.

Solution: Use .Handlers() to register Agreement Dispatcher routes explicitly:

Handler Types Must Be Provided

You must provide all possible handler types for DI registration:

Why? Brighter registers these handler types with the DI container so they can be resolved at runtime.

Performance Implications

Agreement Dispatcher has a small performance overhead compared to standard routing:

Overhead Breakdown

Standard Routing:

  • Handler type lookup: Dictionary lookup (~O(1))

  • No lambda execution

Agreement Dispatcher:

  • Lambda execution

  • Handler type lookup: Dictionary lookup (~O(1))

Performance Considerations

For most applications, this overhead is negligible:

  • Acceptable: Web APIs, message processing, background jobs

  • Acceptable: 99.9% of scenarios

  • Consider carefully: Ultra-low latency systems (microsecond SLAs)

  • Consider carefully: Millions of messages per second

Optimization tip: Keep routing lambdas simple. Avoid expensive operations like database calls or external API calls.

Integration with Dynamic Message Deserialization

Agreement Dispatcher can be combined with Dynamic Message Deserialization for two-level routing:

This provides powerful, flexible routing:

  1. CloudEvents type determines the Request type

  2. Request content determines the Handler

Complete Example

Here's a complete example showing Agreement Dispatcher with multiple routing strategies:

Best Practices

1. Keep Routing Logic Simple

Routing lambdas should be fast and deterministic:

2. Provide Clear Error Messages

Handle unexpected cases gracefully:

3. Document Routing Rules

Document the routing logic for maintainability:

4. Use Standard Routing When Possible

Only use Agreement Dispatcher when you need dynamic routing:

5. List All Possible Handlers

Always provide the complete list of handler types:

Troubleshooting

Handler Not Found Error

Problem: Runtime error saying handler type cannot be resolved.

Cause: Handler type not in the handler types array.

Solution: Add the handler to the array:

AutoFromAssemblies Conflicts

Problem: Agreement dispatcher routes not working with AutoFromAssemblies().

Cause: AutoFromAssemblies() creates fixed mappings.

Solution: Use explicit .Handlers() registration:

Further Reading

Sample Code

Full working examples can be found in the Brighter samples:

  • Agreement Dispatcher: Brighter/samples/WebAPI/ - Examples of dynamic handler selection

  • Multi-handler: Various samples showing handler pipeline composition

Last updated

Was this helpful?